QUICK LINKS
Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village
On October 17, 2006, Tishman Speyer Properties and partner BlackRock investment bank, signed the largest American real estate deal ever, agreeing to pay $5.4 billion for Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, a vast corridor of 110 apartment buildings with a total of 11,232 units, along the East River. Built by Metropolitan Life for returning veterans in 1947, with the help of tax breaks and the government’s powers of eminent domain, nearly three quarters of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village apartments have regulated rents at roughly half the market rate. An apartment can be decontrolled after it becomes vacant, or if the rent reaches $2,000 a month and the existing tenants’ household income rises above $175,000 for two consecutive years. Twenty-seven percent of the apartments are now at market rates and another 1,800 units will be decontrolled over the next two years.
Present tenants fear that a new owner would transform the complexes into a luxury enclave and organized a failed $4.5 billion offer intended to preserve at least 40 percent of the complexes as middle-class housing, for buyers or renters. City officials refused to provide assistance or tax breaks that the tenant’s group had requested, arguing that the city could create and preserve affordable housing for significantly less money at other sites. While Tishman Speyer has pledged that there will be no sudden shift in the neighborhood’s makeup, they refuse to commit to preserving a large block of apartments as affordable housing. They further insist that there are no plans to develop any of the open space in the complex.
NYC Real Estate Boom Ends, Stuy Town Bond Ratings Cut
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 | New York Times | Topic: Finance
The seven-year real estate boom that has transformed many of New York City’s changing neighborhoods has finally ended because of the credit crisis and the financial market’s problems. One of the indicators that the boom has ended is that Standard & Poors has cut the rating on the bonds used in Tishman Speyer’s 2006 purchase of $5.4 billion of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village. The rating was said to be dropped because of a decrease in property value and quick exhaustion of reserve funds.
Stuy Town, Peter Cooper Village Owner Upgrades Complex, Moves Away From Rent-Stabilizaion
Thursday, September 25, 2008 | New York Daily News | Topic: Housing
Long-time residents of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village are fighting Tishman Speyer, owner of the housing complex since 2006, over rising rents and attempts to force out rent-stabilized inhabitants who may be violating rental board rules. Councilman Dan Garodnick, a lifelong resident, says it is clear that Tishman is trying to change the property from primarily rent-stabilized units to market rate. Market rate rents have increased 10% to 20% and some long-term rent-stabilized tenants have received letters asking them to prove they are using their rent-stabilized apartment as their primary residence. Nevertheless, new renters are please with the upgrades and amenities that Tishman Speyer has added to the 110-building, 11,223-unit complex.
Purchase of Stuy Town and Peter Cooper Village 'Trouble Spot' For Commerical Mortgage Market
Monday, September 08, 2008 | Reuters US Edition | Topic: Finance
A report by Barron's points to a concern in the purchase of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village by Tishman Speyer and BlackRock Realty Advisors in 2006 for $5.4 billion as rents have fallen despite predictions that rents would triple by 2011 The deal was closed when the market was at its peak and now some are considering the purchase to be a "trouble spot". Tishman has said that the purchase of the housing complex was a "long-term investment."
Despite Conversion of Some Apartments, Stuy Town Revenues Dropped
Wednesday, July 23, 2008 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
Since developer Tishman-Speyer purchased Stuy Town and Peter Cooper Village two years ago, they have converted a number of previously rent-stabilized apartments to market rate. Despite this conversion, sources say revenues for this past year have dropped. This drop is attributed to legal fees from fighting tenants who contested the conversions and also from the weakening housing market. The conversions have been highly contested by elected officials, tenants, and housing advocates, however the developer maintains the conversions only took place where tenants were abusing the system.
Tishman Speyer Disputes Legitimacy of Tenants
Tuesday, May 27, 2008 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
Tishman Speyer Properties, owner of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, alleges that several hundred of its rent-stabilized tenants are not using their units as primary homes. Over the past year and a half, Tishman Speyer has turned down the renewal of roughly 800 rent-stabilized leases because the company believes that these households are living in other locations the majority of the time. However, these tenants believe that this claim is merely an attempt to replace low-rent households with high-rent ones. Tishman Speyer maintains that they would like to create a community of full-time residents in Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village.
Stuy-Town and Peter Cooper Village Getting Landscaping Overhaul
Sunday, April 20, 2008 | New York Times | Topic: Environment
Work has begun on one of the largest landscaping projects in the history of Manhattan. Tishman Speyer, owner of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, is overseeing the re-landscaping of 60 acres of the 80-acre housing developments. The project involves planting 200,000 plants and is about 20% complete, with a target completion date of June 30. Tishman Speyer did not reveal how much the project was costing, simply noting that it was a “significant price,” but said that it was worth the money for the increased quality of life for current and future residents.
Class-Action Suit Against Stuyvesant Town Owners Fails
Friday, August 24, 2007 | New York Newsday | Topic: Housing
A Manhattan state Supreme Court judge has thrown out a class-action lawsuit by tenants of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village alleging that the complex’s former owner, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and new owner, Tishman Speyer Properties, charged higher rents than allowed by rent regulation rules. While nearly 11,000 units in the complex are rent regulated by law, some 3,000 units are not under the same control. Metropolitan Life sold the complex for $5.4 billion in 2006 to Tishman Speyer, raising fears among many tenants of a potential rent hike.
Landlord Versus Tenants In Stuy-Town
Wednesday, May 30, 2007 | AM New York | Topic: Housing
Tenants of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village who hold leases on their rent-stabilized apartments are saying that their new landlord is probing their lives in order to legally issue them non-renewal notices on their leases. Tishman Speyer, which purchased the developments last year for a record-breaking $5.4 billion, is claiming that hundreds of tenants actually hold residence elsewhere, which provides them with a legal foothold to refuse to renew tenant leases.
Lease Renewal Controversy at Stuyvesant Town
Tuesday, May 29, 2007 | New York Post | Topic: Housing
Long-time residents of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village are alleging that the complex's new landlord is attempting to expel middle-income residents by investigating their property records. Tishman Speyer, the new landlord, is handing out nonrenewal lease letters to tenants with secondary properties, according to some current residents. Daniel Garodnick, member of the New York City Council and resident of the complex in Manhattan, says, "These are scary letters to get."
New Stuyvesant Town Landlord Investigating Tenants
Sunday, May 27, 2007 | ABC Local News | Topic: Housing
Residents of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village claim their new landlord is going to extreme measures to force them out of their rent-controlled apartments, hiring private investigators to dig up financial information which would allow them to issue non-renewal lease notices. Tishman has responded that non-renewal notices are standard practice when there is reason to believe that a lease was being held illegally.
Affordable Housing Rally at Suyvesant Town Draws Thousands
Thursday, May 24, 2007 | AM New York | Topic: Housing
Several thousand people were present for a rally at Stuyvesant town yesterday to protest the loss of affordable housing in New York City. Manhattan Borough President Stringer supported the rally, calling for better legal protection for low and middle-income renters. Stuyvesant Town has been an emblem of the problem since being sold to a private developer who has been trying to remove rent-stabilized tenants. Mayor Bloomberg has promised to create 165,000 units of affordable housing, but some are concerned that the city continues to loose affordable units faster than it can build them.
Tenants Fight For Affordable Housing
Tuesday, May 22, 2007 | Multi-Housing News | Topic: Housing
Tenants of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village have joined with New York Is Our Home, a collective of New York renters, labor leaders and elected officials, and are planning a rally this Wednesday in protest of the potential loss of affordable housing as a result of the $5.4 billion sale of the East Side housing complexes.
Affordable Housing Rally at Stuyvesant Town
Thursday, May 17, 2007 | The Real Deal | Topic: Housing
A large rally for affordable housing has been planned for next Wednesday at Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village. The site was chosen because the controversial sale of the two developments was such a well-known event and was criticized from removing a large amount of affordable housing from the New York City market. However individuals are expected to come to the rally from all over the city and outer boroughs, including from Starrett City and other buildings that have recently been taking out of the Mitchell-Lama program. The rally’s organizers are asking from reform of rent-stabilization and Mitchell-Lama, as well as increased control by New York City of vacancies and high rents.
Residents Have So Far Seen Little Change In Stuyvesant Town
Sunday, April 01, 2007 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
Residents who were concerned about the possibility of a drastic change in life at Stuyvesant town after it was sold by MetLife to Tishman Speyer Properties have so far experienced only incremental changes, at least some of which are positive. Residents reports that they are pleased with the professional attitude with which the new owners operate, and Tishman has promised to bring in new services such as a fitness center and a greenmarket. However according to the New York Times residents continue to expect that Tishman will try and reduce the number of rent-stabilized apartments, bringing as much of the development as possible up to market rates. However Stuyvesant Town continues to provide a unique neighborhood environment, which is important to many of the long-time residents.
City Pension Funds and Real Estate Development
Monday, March 12, 2007 | Metro New York | Topic: Finance
In this NY Metro interview City Comptroller William Thompson discusses the implications of the city's projected $3.9 billion surplus for fiscal year 2007 as well as the challenge of managing the city's $105 billion in pension funds. According to Thompson, nearly $1.2 billion of city pension funds have been invested in housing or real estate and between $500-$600 million, in particular, in affordable housing. Thompson, who opposed the $5.4 billion mega sale bid for Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, says that the city does not invest pension funds in real estate transactions that lessen affordable housing options for lower and middle-income residents.
Two Responses to Two Sales: Stuyvesant Town v. Starrett City
Saturday, March 03, 2007 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
This New York Times article assesses the recent mega sales of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village and Starrett City, the former receiving the blessing of city officials including the mayor and the latter vilified by city officials and public advocates. Why did the city and its leaders react so differently to the $5.4 billion and $1.3 billion sales respectively? The article contends that the Stuyvesant Town sale satisfied the concerns of those interested in preserving affordable housing for the mostly middle-income residents who live there because the developer, Jerry Speyer, has an "insider" reputation in New York that Starrett City developer David Bistricer does not have. In addition, the article contends that the massive amounts of city, state, and federal subsidies at Starrett City contributed to the public's unease with such a large sale to a private developer.
Tenants of Stuyvesant Town File Suit Against Owners
Tuesday, January 23, 2007 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
A group of tenants of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village has filed a lawsuit in the State Supreme Court contending that Metropolitan Life, previous owner of the apartment complex, unlawfully charged market-rate rents for greater than 3,000 apartments. Metropolitan Life, which sold the complex for $5.4 billion in October to Tishman Speyer Properties, had received $24.5 million in tax breaks since 1992 under the city’s J-51 property tax program. The class-action suit alleges that the receipt of city tax breaks prevents the buildings’ owners from converting a majority of the apartments from rent-regulated to market-rate units.
Sticker Shocks Stun Market-Rate Stuyvesant Town Residents
Tuesday, January 16, 2007 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
After the mega $5.4-billion sale of Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village in October by Tishman Speyer Properties, some residents of the 110-building complex have complained about dramatic increases in their rents. The first wave of lease renewal letters post sale reflects “sticker shot” to many long-time Stuyvesant Town residents, who have always prized the complex for its affordability. Some renters argue that the recent rent increases are directly attributable to the massive sale in October, citing 33% increases in some cases. Tishman Speyer disagrees, arguing that the rent increases simply reflect the market rates in the neighborhood. The company points to the fact that 80% of current tenants have already renewed leases for the future.
Early City Budget Shows $2.1 Billion Surplus, Real Estate Deals a Factor
Wednesday, January 10, 2007 | Staten Island Advance | Topic: Politics & Government
The City’s preliminary budget for fiscal year 2008 shows a colossal $2.1 billion surplus, which can be attributed to high tax revenues from property taxes and major commercial real estate deals, like the $5.4-billion sale of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper village. While the fiscal year does not officially end until June, speculation already abounds about what the Bloomberg Administration plans to do with the surplus. In previous years, pressure has arisen to either cut taxes or expand city services and programs. The Mayor’s office fears budget gaps in the future due to a slow down of the economy, while the figures used by the City’s Independent Budget Office (IBO) are more optimistic.
The Story of a $5.4 Billion Deal
Sunday, December 31, 2006 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
The New York Times reports on the negotiations between MetLife and Tishman Speyer which led to the $5.4 billion sale of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village in Manhattan.
2007 MTA Fares Hold Steady, Thanks To Stuyvesant Town Sale?
Wednesday, November 29, 2006 | New York Daily News | Topic: Transportation
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (MTA) 2007 spending plan indicates no new fare hikes on bus and subway fares. Ticket prices will remain at current levels for Metro-North and the Long Island Rail Road, in addition to tolls for bridges and tolls. According to MTA Chairman, Peter Kalikow, the once projected $240 million in fare increases are unnecessary due to the strength of the economy, and expected revenue from the Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village sale. The MTA budget will be up for vote by Christmas.
Sale of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village Finalized
Saturday, November 18, 2006 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
Tishman Speyer Properties has completed the $5.4 billion purchase of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village - the 11,232 apartment, 110 building complex along the East River. A group of tenants tried to delay the sale by Metropolitan Life by citing a provision in the insurance company’s original deal with the City. The sale proceeded even as the issue is being reviewed by City officials.
Stuyvesant Town Deal Closed
Friday, November 17, 2006 | BusinessWeek | Topic: Economic Development
Metlife Inc. completed the $5.4 billion sale of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village on Friday. The deal finalized despite earlier reports that the deal had encountered a snag with a little-known legal provision from 1942. The sale generated $3 billion after taxes for Metlife.
1942 Provision Could Derail Stuyvesant Town Sale
Wednesday, November 15, 2006 | Crain's New York Business | Topic: Housing
The historic $5.4 billion sale of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village could be derailed by a obscure provision that limits owner MetLife Inc. to make no more than a 6% annual profit on the apartment complex. Trautman Sanders, a law firm representing the tenant group that lost its bid to purchase the complex, discovered the condition in a 1942 agreement with New York City. According to the agreement, Met Life said it would keep its rents low, earning no more than 6%, in exchange for a 25-year city tax break.
Mayor Gives $5 Million Fine to Metropolitan Life
Tuesday, November 14, 2006 | New York Times | Topic: Economic Development
The Bloomberg Administration has chosen to fine Metropolitan Life $5 million for reneging on a five-year-old deal in which the insurer agreed to move 1,700 employees to Long Island City, Queens and remain there until 2021. Instead, Metropolitan Life is planning to move much of its operation to Midtown Manhattan under a promise with the Mayor to retain at least 1,750 employees in New York City until 2026. The company was considering plans to move to Jersey City. Final approval of the deal will go to the NYC Industrial Development Agency. The deal between Metropolitan Life and the Bloomberg Administration raises interesting policy questions about retaining large financial institutions in New York.
Who's The Winner: Jacobs Or Moses?
Monday, November 06, 2006 | Gotham Gazette | Topic: Politics & Government
The Gotham Gazette considers the recent sale of Stuyvesant Town and the City's announced housing development in Long Island City through the prism of two luminaries in the planning community: Robert Moses and Jane Jacobs. The Gazette analyzes whether the Jacobs or Moses philosophy is more influential in present day New York.
Can Renters Survive When Buildings Go Condo?
Monday, October 30, 2006 | City Limits Weekly | Topic: Housing
City Limits reports on how renters are trying to keep their apartments when a building is sold to new owners and converted to condominiums. The recent experience of Manhattan House on the Upper East Side may hold lessons for the tenants and new owners of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village.
Assessing The Real Estate Market
Monday, October 23, 2006 | City Limits Weekly | Topic: Housing
City Limits speaks with housing experts to assess the implications of the sale of Stuyvesant Town as well as the Mayor's proposed changes to an important housing tax break, the 421-a program. A clear lesson to be drawn, experts say, is that the City's real estate market is still booming.
Residents Concerned About Future Affordability
Sunday, October 22, 2006 | New York Newsday | Topic: Housing
A number of residents of the recently sold Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village benefit from below market rents. Many pay between $1,200 and $1,600 per month for two-bedroom apartments that average $3,500 elsewhere in Manhattan. The complex of 110 buildings and 11,000 apartments has always been considered a good deal and reportedly had a 20-year waiting list. Long-time residents are nervous as they ponder the buildings’ future.
What Happens Next For Stuyvesant Town?
Thursday, October 19, 2006 | New York Observer | Topic: Housing
A big question on the mind of Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village residents is whether or not the buildings’ new owners plan to convert the complex into condominiums. The lead buyer, Jerry Speyer, said that “no one should be concerned about a sudden or dramatic shift in this neighborhood’s makeup, character or charm,” but real estate experts expect that Speyer's group will move to deregulate the 73 percent of apartments that remain under rent regulation. The New York Observer considers some of the possible outcomes.
A Landlord With Impressive Credentials
Wednesday, October 18, 2006 | New York Times | Topic: Housing
Tishman Speyer, the firm at the head of the investment team in the $5.4 billion deal to buy Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village, is a commanding presence in New York commercial real estate, but currently owns no other residential properties in the City. The New York Times profiles Jerry Speyer, chairman and public face of the company, and looks at his other recent ventures in New York including developing the new Yankee Stadium and purchasing the Pan Am building.
Tishman Speyer To Pay $5.4 Billion For Stuyvesant, Cooper Complex
Wednesday, October 18, 2006 | New York Sun | Topic: Housing
Real estate experts say the pressure will be on Tishman Speyer to generate enough revenue from the property to make their investment worthwhile
5.4B! Stuy Town goes for sky-high price tag
Wednesday, October 18, 2006 | New York Daily News | Topic: Housing
Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village - the 80-acre Manhattan complex of red-brick buildings that has stood as the city's emblem of affordable housing for more than half a century - were sold by MetLife yesterday to Tishman Speyer for $5.4 billion. Word of the deal immediately stoked concerns among tenants and elected officials about the future of the complex, where three-quarters of the 11,200 units are rent-stabilized.


